Slots and the State of the World
Maryland finds itself on the potential brink of a new predatory gambling era, bringing back a policy that failed miserably and was abolished forty years ago. We spend our days arguing the few merits and myriad costs of a policy that we instinctively know to be bad. But we don’t ask ourselves the basic and most important question: How did we get here?
Americans, since the days of Benjamin Franklin, have benefited from our fundamental tendencies towards hard work and thrift. But over the last quarter century, we have forsaken these virtues and now worship at the altar of consumption. This has come at a cost—a cost that we have been all too willing to put off through the modern miracle of virtually limitless credit.
We consumers, however, are hardly alone in our desire to have it all, and to have it right now. Our federal government has been on what can only be described as a binge. Our national debt, an inconceivably massive $3 trillion in 1990 now towers at nearly $11 trillion. At the same time, voters have bought into insane promises of lower and lower taxes. The results have been predictable and devastating.
Part of this federal fiasco has been a shifting of financial responsibility to the states. Mandates grow and funding withers. Governor Martin O’Malley brilliantly called it "trickle-down fiscal irresponsibility.” Federal elected officials lack the will to square taxation and spending. They borrow what they can, and then pass their problems on to the governors. The governors then attempt to financially engineer their way out. They securitize tobacco settlements for quick cash. Some have even attempted to sell their roads to European financiers. No measure is too desperate.
So now what? How can we continue to have an ever expanding set of federal and state programs when taxpayers refuse to pay for them? What we need is a new sucker or “revenue source” as they like to say in Annapolis. Say hello to slots—the perfect solution for governments desperate enough to prey on their own citizens and willing to try anything. Finally, money that can keep those budgetary plates spinning on the sticks for a few more years.
It’s an elected officials dream, allowing the bloating of government to continue unfettered. Corporate interests and their lobbyists can get behind it. It not only keeps them clear of their responsibility to fund government, but creates a new class of corporate entity all too willing to pay taxes—the casino operator. Voters, who generally know that predatory gambling is, well, predatory, see it as a voluntary tax that they don’t really intend to pay.
This tax will be paid by the most perfect entity ever identified in the history of taxation: Somebody Else. Gamblers tend to be poorer and less educated than the rest of us. Lower-income gamblers are often willing gamble far more of their incomes. Some tend toward addiction and fewer than five percent of gamblers will provide over a third of casino revenues. But rarely will an addicted gambler complain.
The sad stories of gambling addiction accumulate in a brutally ceaseless way. Kids are left to literally cook to death in sun-baked parking lots while addicted parents lose the grocery money. Marriages are destroyed. Homes are lost to foreclosure. Retirement dreams simply melt away over a few months of eighteen-hour stints in front of a single “lucky” slot machine.
This, amazingly, is lauded as the ultimate answer to our national spending problem. Governments shift the burden down to gamblers. And gamblers shift the burden to those they love the most. The spouse who had no idea that the 401(k) was lost at the slots and had been replaced with $130,000 in credit card debt. The children who are left to entertain themselves in the casino parking lot for hours a day, year after year. The adult children who are startled to learn that an elderly parent has lost everything and has been contemplating suicide.
We can pretend that we can have every program, every road, and every school. We can demand that our taxes be lower and lower still. We can even talk ourselves into believing that gambling is a harmless way to dodge the bullet one more time. But we can’t do this forever. We are going to have to get back to the basic idea of living within our means. Victimizing our own people solves nothing and only serves to keep those plates spinning for a short time. No number of slot machines is going to solve our problems.
Vote no on Question Two, and demand that Annapolis—and Washington—get serious about our future.




