As a lot of you know, I was considering a run against Rikki Spector for the 5th district City Council seat. Ultimately, I decided against it. It wasn't that I didn't think I could win. It was that I didn't think the the City Council was a place where dynamic thinking and decisive acts could really happen. The culture seems to accept a certain status quo. Bills come roaring out of committee that never should have even been introduced, and a scant few members even bat an eye. It's enough to make you, well, not run.
I have known Stephanie Rawlings-Blake for years. In fact, she is married to a childhood friend. I like her, and I think she'll do a fine job if elected. But I'm supporting her opponent because I think that the election of Michael Sarbanes will mean more. It will change the expectations for the entire Council. And hopefully by creating a more challenging and energized atmosphere, it will encourage more highly qualified people to seek seats on the Council in the next cycle.
On our favorite issue (slots, slots, and more slots), I think Sarbanes has the best articulated position. While I prefer a "line drawn in the sand" approach, politicians have to be, um, political. And I think he does that while making his opposition clear:
"The presence of slots in Maryland will be determined at the State level. While I am not a proponent of slots as the answer to the state's budget problems nor a core economic development strategy, I recognize that this issue will be not be decided by the city council. The city's focus should be on how any proposed slots plan will affect the city. I think that revenue from slots at the state level in part should go to support the racing industry and renovating Pimlico, particularly because the racing jobs and construction jobs there can provide good jobs for working families. I think that public ownership of slots under any proposed state scheme will help to maintain a degree of control over possible unintended consequences. In terms of locations in the city, I think Baltimore should look with a great deal of caution at any proposals to locate slots within the city. There are serious concerns about the impact on other small entertainment businesses in the city, on safety and quality of life in surrounding communities, and on gambling addiction. Like many businesses, slots have an impact beyond their walls and the city should carefully consider these concerns in any slots proposal."Stephanie, on the other hand, puts it another way. I have not edited this, so there are some typos in her response. I say this not to degrade the response, but to make it clear that my typing isn't deteriorating:
"Prior to becoming City Council President, I represented the sixth district of Baltimore on the City Council for nearly twelve years. Included in that district are the Pimlico and Park Heights sections of our City. When I am asked about slots in Baltimore, I always refer to Park Heights and Pimlico because, for twelve years, I have listened to the thoughts and opinions of my neighbors in Park Heights and Pimlico. I have walked those streets time and time again.If slots were to come to Baltimore, I cannot see any realistic possibility of them going anywhere but to the race course to save jobs for the racing industry and to keep the Preakness at Pimlico. Pimlico it is a venue where gambling already exists, after all.Like many of my neighbors, I support the limited use of slots, provided that the money from the machines goes toward revitalization of the communities that seemingly have not shared in our City's prosperity. This includes school construction and repair, the opening of additional recreation centers, the elimination of blighted vacant properties and the creation of green space, among other projects."What I hate about this response is that it parrots the O'Malley line about "limited slots." Anyone who understands how the national gambling industry operates in terms of government relations should know that they will spend an unlimited amount of money in order to get to each round expansion. Again, neither of these are perfect responses, but Sarbanes doesn't fail to acknowledge the enormous problems that slots would bring to our neighborhoods. Not the only reason to support Sarbanes over Rawlings-Blake, but certainly a good start.
So I am supporting Mr. Sarbanes for a more effective City Council and a better city. I'd be delighted if you joined me. You can
email me to find out how you can get involved, and you can learn more about Sarbanes
HERE.
Labels: sarbanes city council